PDF for print Find calendar
Project 1 linked to Sustainability, Development and Inequality
|Master programme in||
Global and Development Studies / European Master in Global Studies
|Type of activity||
Read about the Master Programme and find the Study Regulations at ruc.dk
|REGISTRATION AND STUDY ADMINISTRATIVE|
Registration for project-exam: Please remember to confirm your registration by signing up for exam as a group when the group formation is final. The registration is through STADS Online Student Service
When registering for courses, please be aware of the potential conflicts and overlaps between course and exam time and dates. The planning of course activities at Roskilde University is based on the recommended study programmes, which should not overlap. However, if you choose optional courses and/or study plans that goes beyond the recommended study programmes, an overlap of lectures or exam dates may occur depending on which courses you choose.
|Number of participants||
|Responsible for the activity|
|Head of study|
ISE Registration & Exams (firstname.lastname@example.org)
The objective of the project module is to enable and equip students to make an in-depth problem-based study of a research area related to the course in Sustainability, Development and Inequality. The object of study is developed by the students, but the topic must be associated with the taught course.
In researching for and writing the project, the active application of academic knowledge and theory will provide students with a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the chosen problem area.
Working in groups of minimum 3 students, the project will allow students to build upon the knowledge they acquired in the course on Sustainability, Development and Inequality. Through their independent research and supervision by academic staff, the project groups will learn to select a relevant research problem, formulate an appropriate research question, select theory and method(s), identify or generate data, and analyse the research problem.
They will learn to present the main points of the analysis and the overall results and arguments in an abstract and in a clear and accessible project report format aimed at a wider non-academic audience.
|Detailed description of content||
The starting point for the project is to articulate a problem formulation related to the causes and consequences of sustainability, development and inequality.
The students then review and compare critically relevant literature, and write a state-of-the-art section for the project. It is recommended to draw on the literature from the Sustainability, Development and Inequality course.
After formulating a research design including methods and analytical approach, the students identify or generate relevant data for the analysis.
Building on the approaches introduced in the course, the students conduct their analysis, and discuss their findings and situate them against broader debates on Sustainability, Development and Inequality such as those introduced in the course.
Guidance on the use of quantitative methods in projects and theses
If you and your group find quantitative analyses relevant to answer your research question, and your supervisor cannot help, here is an offer of assistance. We offer a workshop where a group of researchers will talk about how to use quantitative data in projects and theses. We will present an overview of publicly available data sets, as well as the your possibilities, if you wish to collect your own data. We expect you to have taken a course in basic quantitative methods (BC 8 or equivalent).
The workshop is held on September 27 2023, 12:15-02:00 pm, in theory room 25.3-005
After the workshop you/your group will have the opportunity to book an appointment with a skilled student, who will help with downloading and preparing data for analysis and interpretation. If you need extra guidance on any particular issue, you will be referred to a relevant researcher. Contact Ivan Foberg (email@example.com) to schedule an appointment.
|Course material and Reading list||
Students create their own curriculum.
|Overall plan and expected work effort||
The majority of the activity takes place as self-study, where the group of 3-5 students works independently with a problem-oriented project. The project group can expect up to 3-4 supervision sessions of about 45-60 minutes each.
“Study intensity Outline
• The proposed study intensity for a student in this activity: 270 hours
• The proposed distribution of hours on teaching and learning activities
• Project formation incl introduction to problem-orientated project learning (PPL) (20 hours); group-based individual project work incl project group meetings (205 hours); supervisory meetings incl preparation and debriefing (10 hours); mid-term evaluation incl preparation (30 hours); exam incl preparation (5 hours)
Teaching and learning activities:
• Introduction to PPL
• Project formation
• Group-based project work
• Supervision meetings
• Mid-term evaluation
• Presentation and peer-feedback
|Evaluation and feedback||
The activity are evaluated regularly regarding the study board evaluation procedure. The activity responsible will be orientated about a potential evaluation of the activity at semesterstart. Se link to the study board evaluation praxis here https://intra.ruc.dk/nc/for-ansatte/organisering/raadnaevn- og-udvalg/oversigt-over-studienaevn/studienaevn-for-internationale-studier/arbejdet-medkvalitet- i-uddannelserne/
Programme will be available on Moodle.
|Overall learning outcomes||
|Form of examination||
Oral project exam in groups with individual assessment.
Permitted group size: 3-5 students.
The character limits of the project report are:
For 3 students: 96,000-132,000 characters, including spaces.
For 4 students: 120,000-156,000 characters, including spaces.
For 5 students: 132,000-180,000 characters, including spaces.
The character limits include the cover, table of contents, summary, bibliography, figures and other illustrations, but exclude any appendices.
The project report must include a summary, that is part of the assessment. The summary can either be written in English or Danish.
Time allowed for exam including time used for assessment is for:
3 students: 75 minutes.
4 students: 90 minutes.
5 students: 105 minutes.
Writing and spelling skills in the project report are part of the assessment.
Permitted support and preparation materials at the oral exam: All
Assessment: 7-point grading scale.
Moderation: Internal co-assessor.
|Form of Re-examination||
Samme som ordinær eksamen / same form as ordinary exam
|Type of examination in special cases||
|Examination and assessment criteria||
Students can identify a relevant problem area and formulate a pertinent and coherent research question
Students engage with and critically review relevant literature
Students select, compare and apply a relevant theoretical framework
Students reflect, select and apply relevant methodological tools.
Students can justify their analytical choices and findings
Besides the above, the following will be part of the assessment • Resume in English or Danish • Writing and spelling skills are part of the assessment.
Oral presentation Same criteria as for the project, but also: The student is able to: • Present and communicate • Take part in dialogue and discussion about the written project report
The assessment is a collective assessment of all above.